How to add the support of the get_next_object() callback to the 5-c_stats example?

[per]

@jhu

HI @per, this issue is for get_object() and get_next_object() case, and is not for get_elem().

Yes, of course (you can’t reply with confd_tag_value_t for get_elem()).

@jhu

If CONFD_SET_TAG_LIST is not used and only used CONFD_SET_TAG_CBUF, confd will complain the below error:

Ah, OK - that is what you “should” do, but it seems leaf-lists and the combination of CONFD_DAEMON_FLAG_STRINGSONLY, CONFD_DAEMON_FLAG_LEAF_LIST_AS_LEAF, and “bulk” replies didn’t actually work in plain ConfD-6.7. Should be OK in 6.7.2, 7.1, and later.

[jhu]

Thanks @per. I tried it on confd 6.7.5. It does work with only CONFD_SET_TAG_CBUT. Much appreciated you to help to address this block issue. Thanks again.